New post

Mar 3, 2022 | business, students

.

Assignment 3: Translate the Evidence into Practice (25 points)

The next steps in the evidence-based practice (EBP) process includes implementing and translating the intervention chosen in the PICOT question (Week 1) into the clinical setting. Pilot projects are often used before implementing a change into an entire organization. Discuss the following questions related to implementing the chosen PICOT intervention as if a pilot test project were being facilitated by the masters prepared nurse:

PICOT Question:

In older people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), how efficient are mental stimulation and memory training compared to Aducanumab in managing agitation and restlessness throughout 10 years after initial diagnosis?

.

Assignment Criteria:

1.Briefly explain the problem and the PICOT question and the intervention
2.Describe the pilot project for the chosen intervention and include:
a.Explain the who, what, where, when and how of the pilot project
b.Describe a specific model or framework of change that will be used to facilitate the implementation of the intervention.
3.Describe the stakeholders and their roles in the pilot project.
4.Propose two (2) strategies that would promote engagement of the stakeholders in the project.
5.Discuss a specific practice guideline that supports the intervention.
6.Identify major organizational resources needed for the pilot project.
7.Discuss how the outcome of the intervention will be measured.
8.The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 5 to 6 pages excluding the title and reference page.
9.Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion.
10.Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
11.Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our may is not used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
12.Include a minimum of four (4) professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
13.APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).
14.Submit the assignment to Turnitin prior to the final submission, review the Originality Report, and make any needed changes.
15.Submit by the posted due date.

.

.

.

.

Assignment 3: Translate the Evidence into Practice (25 points)

Assignment Criteria

10 points

9 points

7 points

0 points

.

All topics/criteria addressed and all questions fully answered.

All topics/criteria addressed and most questions fully answered.

All topics/criteria addressed and most questions partially answered.

One or more topics/criteria not addressed or completely answered.

Quality/Accuracy of Information

9 points

8 points

4 points

0 points

.

Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It includes several supporting details and/or examples.

Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It provides supporting details and/or examples.

Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. A few details and/or examples are given.

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic/criteria.

Organization

4 points

2 points

.50 points

0 points

.

Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading.

Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading.

There is an attempt at organization but errors exist. No levels of heading.

The information or overall structure appears disorganized.

Sources

2 points

1 point

0.5 points

0 points

.

All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/ historical source.

The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe or a classic/historical source.

Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years.

Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years.

Earned Points

.

.

.

.

Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar.

Final Total

.

.

.

.

.

.

.