Interpretation of Regression Results: Simple Regression, Regression Problems

Your company is preparing an estimate of its production costs for the coming period. The  controller estimates that direct materials costs are $45 per unit and that direct labor costs are $21 per hour. Estimating overhead, which is applied on the basis of direct labor costs, is difficult.

The controller’s office estimated overhead costs at $3,600 for fixed costs and $18 per unit for variable costs. Your colleague, Lance, who graduated from a rival school, has already done the analysis and reports the “correct” cost equation as follows:

Overhead = $10,600 + $16.05 per unit

Lance also reports that the correlation coefficient for the regression is .82 and says, “With 82 percent of the variation in overhead explained by the equation, it certainly should be adopted as the best basis for estimating costs.”

When asked for the data used to generate the regression, Lance produces the following:

Month

Overhead

Unit Production

1

$57,144

3,048

2

60,756

3,248

3

77,040

4,176

4

56,412

3,000

5

81,396

3,408

6

72,252

3,928

7

63,852

3,336

8

73,596

4,016

9

77,772

4,120

10

60,048

3,192

11

61,632

3,368

12

73,920

4,080

13

73,248

3,888

The company controller is somewhat surprised that the cost estimates are so different. You have therefore been assigned to check Lance’s equation. You accept the assignment with glee.

Required

Analyze Lance’s results and state your reasons for supporting or rejecting his cost equation.