Kent, a wholesale distributor of cameras, entered into a contract with Williams. Williams agreed to purchase 100 cameras with certain optional attachments. The contract was made on March 1, 2007, for delivery by March 15, 2007; terms: 2/10, net 30. Kent shipped the cameras on March 6, and they were delivered on March 10. The shipment did not conform to the contract, in that one of the attachments was not included. Williams immediately notified Kent that he was rejecting the goods. For maximum legal advantage Kent’s most appropriate action is to
- Bring an action for the price less an allowance for the missing attachment.
- Notify Williams promptly of his intention to cure the defect and make a conforming delivery by March 15.
- Terminate his contract with Williams and recover for breach of contract.
- Sue Williams for specific performance.