Interpreting Financial Statements: Effects of Asset Write Downs

Byte City, Inc., is a leading independent provider of systems and network management software. Its income statements are abbreviated as follows:

2000

1999

Net revenues

Software products

$64,282,171

$ 52,392,108

Product support and enhancements

32,545,876

27,419,766

Total net revenues

96,828,047

79,811,874

Operating expenses

Cost of goods sold

3,614,919

3,215,778

Sales and marketing

45,782,349

38,372,418

Research, development, and support

23,582,478

27,652,020

General and administrative

14,622,594

14,887,923

Write down of marketing rights and

restructuring expenses

0

17,236,845

Total operating expenses

87,602,340

101,364,984

Income (loss) from operations

$ 9,225,707

($21,553,110)

Required

a. Conduct a horizontal and vertical analysis of Byte City’s income statement.

b. Identify any major unusual items in either year. How might these items affect the future? How might they have been reflected in prior years? How might they have been caused by events in prior years?

c. Discuss why Byte City’s cost of goods sold is so low relative to other expenses, and also with respect to revenues.

d. Restate 1999’s income (loss) from operations by excluding the $17,236,845 write down. What does this restated amount indicate about possible trends in Byte City’s total operating expenses? How does this affect the trend in income from operations?

e. Based only on the information provided, would you predict that Byte City would have a positive income from operations in 2001? Why? By extending the trends in net revenues and in operating expenses to 2001, what amount of income from operations would you predict?