attn abhishek 494455

A4. Accounting Rate of Return (1) Unacceptable (2) Needs Revision (3) Meets Standard (4) Exemplary The candidate does not accurately calculate the accounting rate of return for this project. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate accurately calculates the accounting rate of return for this project. Criterion Score:1.00 Comments on this criterion: The ARR calculation of 8.91% is incorrect. A more detailed feedback regarding the formula used can be provided if the calculation would be performed within the Excel template and the Excel file would be submitted instead of a converted PDF file. A5. Payback Period (1) Unacceptable (2) Needs Revision (3) Meets Standard (4) Exemplary The candidate does not accurately calculate the unadjusted payback period in years and months. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate accurately calculates the unadjusted payback period in years and months. Criterion Score:1.00 Comments on this criterion: The provided payback period at 5 years and 0.1 month is not accurate. The number of years is correct; please review the calculation of the number of months. Provide the answer in full months. Detailed Results (Rubric used: FNT1-319.1.3-01-10, 2.1-04, 2.5-05) Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, word usage, ease of understandability) (1) Unacceptable (2) Needs Revision (3) Meets Standard (4) Exemplary There is no evidence of response to the prompts. The articulation of the response is weak. The articulation of the response is adequate. The articulation of the response is skillful. Criterion Score:3.00 Accuracy of Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, spelling) (1) Unacceptable (2) Needs Revision (3) Meets Standard (4) Exemplary The work includes several major errors that disrupt the meaning or flow of the response. The work includes a few major errors and/or many minor errors that interfere with the clarity of the response. The work includes a few minor errors but no readily detectable major errors. The work includes no…