WILMONT COMPANY

(Variable Costing)

Wilmont Company’s executive committee was meeting to select a new vice president of operations. The leading candidate was Howard Kimball, manager of Wilmont’s largest division. Howard had been divisional manager for three years. The president of Wilmont, Larry Olsen, was impressed with the significant improvements in the division’s profits since Howard had assumed command. In the first year of operations, divisional profits had increased by 20%. They had shown significant improvement for the following two years as well. To bolster support for Howard, the company’s president circulated the following divisional income statements (dollars in thousands):

2004

2005

2006

Sales

$ 30,000

$ 32,000

$ 34,000

Less: Cost of goods sold 1/

26,250

26,400

27,200

Gross margin

$ 3,750

$ 5,600

$ 6,800

Less: Selling and admin 2/

3,000

3,600

3,800

NET INCOME

$ 750

$ 2,000

$ 3,000

1/ ? assumes a LIFO inventory flow

2/ ? all costs are fixed

“As you can see,” Larry observed at a meeting, “Howard has increased profits by a factor of four times since 2004. That’s by far the most impressive performance of any divisional manager. We could certainly use someone with that kind of drive. I definitely believe that Howard should be the new vice president.”

“I’m not quite as convinced that Howard’s performance is as impressive as it appears,” responded Bill Peters, the vice president of finance. “I could hardly believe that Howard’s division could show the magnitude of improvement revealed by the income statements. So I asked the divisional controller to supply some additional information. As the data suggest, the profits realized by Howard’s division may be attributable to a concerned effort to produce for inventory. In fact, I believe it can be shown that the division is actually showing a loss each year and that real profits have declined as much as 15% since 2004.” Peters then showed the following information:

2004

2005

2006

Sales (units)

150,000

160,000

170,000

Production 1/

200,000

250,000

300,000

Actual (and budgeted) fixed overhead

$15,000,000

Fixed overhead rate

$ 75

$ 60

$ 50

Unit variable production costs

$ 100

$ 105

$ 110

1/ ? this represents both expected and actual production.

Fixed overhead rates are computed using expected actual production

Required:

1. Explain what Bill Peters meant by “producing for inventory”.

2. Recast the income statements in variable-costing format. Now, how does the performance of the division appear?

3. Reconcile the differences in the income figures using the two methods for each of the three years.

4. If you were a shareholder, how would you detect income increases that are caused mainly by production for inventory?