Cost Management and Analysis #22753

ASSESSMENT ITEM 2: GROUP ASSIGNMENT (Group Component)

Weighting: 20%.

Autumn 2014

1. OVERVIEW

Your group is to perform the financial analysis (feasibility study) outlined in Attachment One of this

document. The analysis is for UTS management (i.e., your CMA Lecturer).

Unlike earlier semesters, this assignment allows you to do analysis on a project which if successful,

may actually be implemented by UTS. Details of the assignment and some background information

are available in the attachments.

Your group must submit and present your financial analysis in three formats:

A. Excel – financial modelling

B. Word – written report

C. PowerPoint – for presentation in-class (5 minutes per group).

Extracts from the financial modelling are to be included in your Word report and PowerPoint

presentation.

A key factor to keep in mind is that a feasibility study is not as detailed as a full business plan. Hence,

you have discretion as to what information to keep in the body of the report and what information

to exclude. A key part of this project is that it requires you to identify and obtain the relevant

information via research, analysis and estimation. You need to only include information relevant to

decision-making in the report.

2. EXCEL

UTS management (i.e., your CMA Lecturer) will review your financial modelling. He will need to be

very comfortable with your technical execution. Like many senior managers, he is extremely time

poor and needs to be communicated to very concisely. He needs to quickly understand the design of

your models, as well as assumptions and limitations.

You will email your Excel file to your lecturer for review.

Here is what he will expect to see:

? The model is clearly structured, with supporting tables in separate tabs that build-up from a

detailed breakdown.

? Input and output tables are clear and separate.

? Tables logically present key components (e.g., costs, benefits, assumptions and parameters).

? The model is materially complete and comprehensive.

? The model is technically correct, e.g., cash flows are on an after-tax basis and treatments are

conventional.

? Excel extracts used in the written report or PowerPoint presentation should be appropriately

formatted, e.g., present figures in $M (e.g., $0.18M for $180,000).

2

3. WORD

Remember, the UTS management is your audience and they face budget constraints, so focus on the

numbers. It should be very clear what the document is about, what the analysis implies, and what

recommendations you are making (if any) for future progression of the initiative. Include evaluation

of how the initiatives are aligned with the ‘corporate’ strategy.

You will lose marks if you include superfluous information in the report. He is highly knowledgeable

about the business generally (e.g., its strategy and structure) and will be irritated by time wasted

reading an unfocussed report (although he is often unfamiliar with operational issues). He wants the

report to present only pertinent information and key aspects of the financial modelling.

This is a business style report for a non-academic ‘insider’. It must provide concise and easily

readable information to aid decision-making. It must include explanation of major conceptual points

with simple definitions and explanation of relevant terminology (especially operational matters) and

complexities).

You MUST INCLUDE an Executive Summary. It will be sent to the UTS decision makers so it must be

comprehensive and describe the ‘big picture’ and the main ‘numbers’ (e.g., net savings, Capex, NPV,

IRR). The structure should also include Introduction, Discussion of Key Findings, and Conclusion.

Your report must:

? analyse and discuss the information, and evaluate it critically.

? identify problems and suggest solutions.

? speculate about future trends and impacts.

Attachments: