(Cost control evaluation) The Arizona Concrete Company makes precast concrete steps for use with manufactured housing. The plant had the following 2001 budget based on expected production of 3,200 units:

Standard Cost

Amount Budgeted

Direct material

$22.00

$ 70,400

Direct labor

12.00

38,400

Variable overhead:

Indirect material

4.20

13,440

Indirect labor

1.75

5,600

Utilities

1.00

3,200

Fixed overhead:

Supervisory salaries

40,000

Depreciation

15,000

Insurance

9,640

Total

$195,680

Cost per unit _ $195,680 _ 3,200 _ $61.15 Actual production for 2001 was 3,500 units, and actual costs for the year were as follows:

Direct material used

$ 80,500

Direct labor

42,300

Variable overhead:

Indirect material

14,000

Indirect labor

6,650

Utilities

3,850

Fixed overhead:

Supervisory salaries

41,000

Depreciation

15,000

Insurance

8,800

Total

$212,100

Cost per unit _ $212,100 _ 3,500 _ $60.60 The plant manager, John Wessly, whose annual bonus includes (among other factors) 20 percent of the net favorable cost variances, states that he saved the company $1,925 [($61.15 _ $60.60) _ 3,500]. He has instructed the plant cost accountant to prepare a detailed report to be sent to corporate headquarters comparing each component’s actual per unit cost with the per unit amounts set forth above in the annual budget to prove the $1,925 cost savings.

a. Is the actual to budget comparison proposed by Wessly an appropriate one? If Wessly’s comparison is not appropriate, prepare a more appropriate comparison.

b. How would you, as the plant cost accountant, react if Wessly insisted on his comparison? Suggest what alternatives are available to you.